Thursday, October 24, 2019

Isabelo L. Tampinco “ Bewitching Pose “










Collectors choice.

I have written articles in past posts about beginning the journey of becoming a collector of fine art. I have talked about the need to be an educated buyer and to always be cautious in what you purchase.
Being an educated and informed collector is your best protection always.
I have been asked to talk about the sculpture I wrote about in the last post. I have been questioned as to my sincerity in my comments, so as I have now sold the sculpture I will talk about the piece in question.
The name of the sculpture was “ Bewitching Pose “ by Isabelo L. Tampinco signed and dated 1908.
cast marble, H:21” x L:8” x W:7”(53 cm x 20 cm x 18 cm)

I include the article below that was on the internet as source material and it speaks of the life of the sculptor Tampinco.


Tampinco: Bewitching Pose

Isabelo L. Tampinco (1850 - 1933)

Bewitching Pose

signed and dated 1908
marble
H:21” x L:8” x W:7”(53 cm x 20 cm x 18 cm)
Estimate: P 200,000
Providence:

Acquired directly from the artist’s grandaughter, Amparo Z. Tampinco

Lot 86 of the Leon Gallery Auction on 7 February 2015.

Isabelo Tampinco was a Filipino sculptor known for his woodcarvings for churches, most notably the Church of San Ignacio in Intramuros: altar, the pillars, the ceilings and the other intricate portions of the church; public edifices; and homes. Specific examples of his work were polychrome wood figures of saints and angels. Among his works were Manila Cathedral’s famous facade, the high relief on Santo Domingo church’s molave door, the main altar of the Laoag Cathedral, and woodcarvings in San Agustin church. Out of a desire to create a uniquely Filipino style, he incorporated native flora and fauna designs in his sinuous openwork and Art Nouveau whiplash outlines style of woodcarving. Among his native motifs were the banahaw, areca palm, and bamboo. The said detail became known as “Tampinco frames.”

A Chinese mestizo and a direct descendant of Rajah Lakandula, he was born in Binondo, Manila. He was the son of Tampinco y delos Reyes and Maria Justa de Lacandola. He apprenticed in the carving shops of Binondo and Santa Cruz districts and was able to start his career in his 20s. His works dated as early as 1870. When Tampinco began his art, even while he was trained in school with a classical foundation, there was a revival of the gothic style in Europe. These styles became very evident in his design of churches, such as that of the fallen San Ignacio Church. At age 26, he was chosen as the representative of the Philippines at the 1876 Philadelphia Centennial Exposition in the United States. In 1878 Tampinco landed an important commission- the undertaking of the historic Ayuntamiento which neded refurnishing. Tampinco worked on the statues, lions, the
wooden crowns of state chairs and additional ornamentation for Queen Mercedes’ catafalque.

Receiving the “Diploma de Honor” given by the Royal Jury from the Exposicion General de las Islas Filipinas in Madrid, Spain in 1887, was said to be his most important recognition. Other awards and distinctions that Tampingco reaped were the Gold Medal at the Exposicion de Filipinas in 1895, another Gold Medal was at the St Louis Exposition in 1904.

When the Spaniards left and the American colonizers came, Tampinco enjoyed the newfound freedom as he was able to complete majority of his nude sculptures. Most of his works were either plaster of Paris or concrete. During the American Period, Tampinco was to land a few more commissions, including the interior decoration of the National Museum Building and later the Malacanang Palace in 1926 when he was already past his seventies. This female figure from 1908 reflects a lot of Tampinco’s formal training.

At age 15, he enrolled at the Academia de Dibujo y Pintura, Manila’s art academy, and studied sculpture under Agustin Saez and Lorenzo Rocha. He was hailed as one of the most outstanding sculptors of his time and was admired by Jose Rizal , who was his classmate in a modeling class at the Ateneo Municipal de Manila. He also had formal schooling at the Escuela de Artes y Oficios under the tutelage of Agustin Saez and Lorenzo Rocha. Escuela de Artes y Oficios was patterned after the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture which was established in 1648 by King Louis XIV of France. At this time (mid to turn of the 19h century) realism in the Classico-Romantic style was highly favored - an artistic style that was at the same time realistic, classical and romantic- an idealized version of the physical reality imbued with a delicate touch of emotion.

Tampinco’s style would show aspects of Neoclassicism, from the 1900s to his death in 1933. This was already the American Period. The style emphasized on “symbolic or allegorical iconography” and his penchant for faithful representation of details and psychological realism. This female figure as an allegorical personification is reminiscent of the neoclassical style. Inspired by Greek and Roman antiquity, this figure integrates classical motifs as the scroll in her hand.
toto gonzalez faved this

Leo Cloma 4mo
Sold on auction for PHP 420,480.


ISABELO TAMPINCO.. “ THE GLADIATORS".






                                                          “ GLADIATORS “    [ original title unknown]                  


      by ISABELO L. TAMPINCO. (19 November 1850 – 30 January 1933)
     “ Gladiators “ is not the original title as that is unknown.

We will do the description of the two sculptors but the sculpture that we will refer to as soldier “B” is in the National Museum of the Philippines and the title on the sculpture is,
“ Soldier Unsheathing his Sword “, Isabelo L. Tampinco, plaster cast, ca. 1880's.

Description of “ THE GLADIATORS “ [original title unknown.]
cast marble.
30.5cm high x 28cm x 20cm.
Base is round 21cm dia. 1.5cm thick.
Signed...... “ I L T “.. 1890. [ both sculptures ]



                                                         "A"                                         "B"

 These two Gladiators that I will describe together, as they are a pair, I will refer to them as “A' and “B” for easy reference.
Both Soldiers are dressed in identical uniforms, though there are some subtle differences. They both have on helmets, a cape, and a layered battle skirt, both have on sandals with open toes.
Each Soldier has a sword and scabbard with shoulder strap over the right shoulder and a buckle on the chest for adjustment of the placement of the scabbard on the left hip. They both have a round battle shields that have a design embossed on the outer surface.

What are the differences?

“A” is standing with his sword drawn in his right hand and his shield firmly held by his left arm and hand in the shield grips. The shield is resting on the ground, ready for action.








“B” is drawing his sword out of his scabbard with his right hand and holding the scabbard with his left hand. His shield is hanging from his right shoulder by the shoulder strap on the shield and still standing on the ground. 






Soldier “A” is kneeling on his left knee with his right leg bent, he is looking to his right and his head is bent slightly forward. He is wearing a helmet and a clock, caught under the throat.
Soldier “B” is beginning to rise up on his left leg and his right leg is bent under him. He is looking to his left and his head is leaning forward. He is wearing a helmet and a cloak that is caught at the throat.

 “ This work of a Roman soldier [ "B"] crouched behind his shield while unsheathing his sword is one of the earliest works of Isabelo Tampinco.
The facial expression of the soldier and the fluid lines of the composition reflects Tampinco's talent at a young age.”
Pg., 78. “ The life and Art of Isabelo Tampinco” by Santiago Albano Pilar.

Notable differences of each Soldier.

The side flap on the helmet of Soldier “A” is turned down and the side flap of Soldier “B” is still turned up.


                                                                              "B"

                                                                               "A"



The top of the sword scabbard of Soldier “A” has three distinct rings around it, whereas the top of the scabbard of Soldier “B” only has two.


                                                                                "A"

                                                                                "B"


Also the shield of Soldier “B” has a very distinct shoulder strap, whereas there is no shoulder strap on the shield of Soldier “A”.
                                                                               "B"
                                                                              "A"   

 The cloak clasps under the throat of each Soldier are different from each other.
On the sword guard of Soldier “B” there are distinct markings which can be easily seen, but there are no markings on the guard of Soldier “A”.

From the back of the Gladiators.
The Helmets of both Soldiers are little different, on Soldier “A” the back neck guard is round in shape and much longer in length than the neck guard on Soldier “B”. The neck guard on Soldier “B” is not as deep or long as Soldier “A” but is wider across the back of the helmet and squarer in shape with rounded off ends.
The helmet of Soldier ”A” has one strap around the back of the helmet, whereas the helmet of Soldier “B” has two straps.
The tail/tassel on the back of helmet “B” is much longer than the tail/tassel on the back of helmet “A”.

                                                      "B"                                               "A"

 The shields of both Soldiers are covered at the top by their cloaks.
The embossed design on shield “A” is quite different from the design on shield “B”
Both shields at first glance look very similar but closer inspection shows quite a different design on each shield. The design is similar as both are done from a center circle and in four parts but that’s where the similarity stops.


                                                          "B"                                  "A"
Both bases are round.
Both bases are signed “ I L T
                                      1890"



DISTINGUISHING FACTS.
The plaster of paris sculpture, “ Soldier unsheathing his sword ” that is in the National Museum of the Philippines, was not standing on a round base and was unsigned and the card read ca. 1880's.
The base was added later for the marble casting and was clearly signed and dated.
The museums date is ca. 1880 and these sculptures are dated 1890.

Sculpture “A” is also stamped under the cloak beside the shield from the back,
“ UNIVERSAL STATUARY Corp.
CHICAGO, ILL.
c. 1953. 833L.
There is no similar stamp on Soldier “B”. The only conclusion that I can draw is that there was no appropriate place on Soldier “B” to allow the stamp to be inserted, the stamp is quite big.
As these are clearly a pair one stamp was enough.
We have asked why these where molded in Chicago in 1953 and the only answer was that the family chose to mold them there.

                                                                                 "A"


They are clearly Isabelo Tampinco's work, they are in beautiful condition and a wonderful example of early Tampinco sculpture.

I do hope that this post has been of interest to you and helps you with your collection considerations.


Happy collecting

Mark E Shellshear
Art Consultant.
markshellshear@gmail.com